Alan Watts on Success: The Wisdom of Insecurity and Living Without Anxiety

Who Was Alan Watts?

Alan Wilson Watts (1915–1973) was a British-born philosopher, writer, and speaker who became one of the most influential interpreters of Eastern philosophy — particularly Zen Buddhism, Taoism, and Vedanta — for Western audiences. He wrote over 25 books and recorded hundreds of lectures that continue to circulate widely online, introducing countless people to ideas they had no previous access to through formal education.

Watts was not a conventional academic. He resisted the label of "guru" and described himself as a "philosophical entertainer." He was ordained as an Anglican priest, later left the church, moved to the San Francisco Bay Area, and became a central figure in the counterculture of the 1960s. Yet his ideas have proven far more durable than any specific cultural moment — they speak to perennial human struggles with anxiety, identity, and meaning.

His most lasting contribution to success philosophy is his diagnosis of what he called "the backwards law" and his exploration of insecurity — the argument that the frantic pursuit of certainty, control, and achievement is itself what prevents genuine flourishing. In an era of productivity culture, dopamine optimization, and hustle ideologies, Watts reads as a radical counterpoint that often turns out to be the missing piece.

The Wisdom of Insecurity

Published in 1951, The Wisdom of Insecurity is perhaps Watts' most practically applicable book. His central argument is that the age of anxiety — his term for modern Western life — is produced not by external circumstances but by a fundamental mismatch between how we think and the nature of reality. We think in terms of permanence, control, and future security, but reality is characterized by impermanence, flux, and radical uncertainty.

The result is chronic anxiety: we are always preparing for a future that never quite arrives, always trying to secure a self that is always changing, always chasing a happiness that recedes when approached directly. The wisdom of insecurity is not a resignation to chaos or a counsel of passivity. It is the recognition that real security — the only kind worth having — comes from being fully present to and at ease with life as it actually is, rather than as we wish it would be.

For ambitious people, this is a particularly sharp message. The striving mind creates a baseline of low-grade anxiety: there is always another goal to reach, another threat to neutralize, another competitor to outperform. Watts does not say abandon ambition. He says examine it. Ask what you are actually running from, and whether the running is working. The answer, for most people, is that the running never stops — and that what they sought to escape is right there with them at every destination.

The Backwards Law

Watts articulated what has become known as the backwards law in multiple ways across his work: "The desire for more positive experience is itself a negative experience. And, paradoxically, the acceptance of one's negative experience is itself a positive experience." The more you try to surface a feeling — confidence, joy, calm — the more you highlight its opposite. The more you try to project an image of success, the more keenly you feel your own inadequacy.

This shows up most clearly in performance contexts. The athlete who is desperately trying to perform well often tightens up and underperforms. The speaker who is anxiously trying to be impressive comes across as stilted and nervous. The writer who is trying to produce a great book often freezes. Watts pointed out that the greatest performances tend to emerge from a state of absorbed engagement — what psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi later called "flow" — in which the performer is not thinking about the performance at all.

Applied to career and life, the backwards law suggests that the path to success is often indirect. Build skills obsessively, serve others genuinely, make things you find interesting, and success — to the extent it follows — follows from those activities rather than from the direct pursuit of it. This is not passive. It requires tremendous effort and attention. But the orientation is toward the work, not the outcome — and that orientation, Watts argued, is what makes the difference.

Living in the Present Moment

Watts was one of the earliest Western popularizers of what is now mainstream — the importance of present-moment awareness. But his version was philosophically deeper than most contemporary mindfulness discourse. He was not primarily recommending a stress-reduction technique. He was making a metaphysical point: the present moment is the only time that actually exists. The past is memory; the future is imagination. The living reality is always now.

When we are consumed by regret about the past or anxiety about the future, we are, in Watts' phrase, "a thin slice of anxiety between two infinities." This is not just psychologically uncomfortable — it represents a fundamental disconnection from the actual texture of life. We miss our own existence while rushing through it toward a future self who will finally be ready to start living.

For those oriented toward achievement, this teaching has a specific practical application. It challenges the pervasive "I'll be happy when..." structure of goal-oriented thinking. Watts was not against goals — he was against using goals as a reason to be absent from your current life. The discipline is to bring your full presence to whatever you are doing now, whether that is a difficult conversation, a creative challenge, or a moment of genuine rest. That quality of presence, he argued, is not only more fulfilling — it tends to produce better work.

Work as Play

One of Watts' most quoted and misunderstood teachings is his distinction between work done as a means to an end versus work engaged with as play. He observed that when you do what you love, you never work a day in your life — but he meant something more radical than career advice. He meant that the deepest satisfaction in work comes from a quality of engagement, of absorption, of bringing one's whole self to the activity, that has the same character as genuine play.

Play, for Watts, is not frivolity. It is activity pursued for its intrinsic quality rather than its instrumental outcome. A child building a sandcastle is not building toward a permanent structure — the value is entirely in the building itself. Watts argued that the greatest artists, scientists, and makers across history had this quality of playful absorption in their work. Einstein famously described much of his thinking as play. Feynman turned physics into a game he played for the joy of it.

This has serious implications for how we select and pursue our work. It suggests that the question is not "what career maximizes my earnings or status?" but "what domain of activity can I engage with such absorbed interest that the engagement itself is its own reward?" When you find that domain and develop genuine competence within it, the external markers of success often follow — because the intrinsically motivated worker simply outperforms the extrinsically motivated one over any meaningful time horizon.

How to Apply Watts' Philosophy to Your Life

Common Misconceptions About Alan Watts' Philosophy

Frequently Asked Questions